Solution:The East India Act of 1813, also known as the Charter Act of 1813, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It allotted Rs. 100,000 to promote education among the Indian masses aThe East India Act of 1813, also known as the Charter Act of 1813, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It allotted Rs. 100,000 to promote education among the Indian masses and also permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English and preach their religion.
In 1823, the governor-general in council appointed a General Committee of Public Instructions, which had the responsibility to grant one lakh rupees for education. The committee consisted of 10 members with Lord Macaulay as the President.
Interestingly, during that time, there was a rapid change in attitude towards the composition of English education, mainly due to the missionaries and the political influence of the English language. Thus, for the council of the East India Company, the decision for granting money faced a greater problem.
The controversy went on for 12 years. Even the General Committee of Public Instruction was also not able to decide the medium of instruction by vote, because out of 10 members, five were supporters of English language or Anglicist as the medium of instruction, and the rest were supporters of the Classical language or Orientalists as a medium of instruction. This is the famous Anglicist and Orientalist controversy.
As the President of the General Committee of Public Instruction, Lord Macaulay wrote a minute (detailed) where he made the conclusion regarding the controversy. By introducing the English language for the education of masses, Macaulay’s opinion was that the public mind of India might expand under the English systems, and through the English language, it may educate the people into a capacity for better government.
nd also permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English and preach their religion. In 1823, the governor-general in council appointed a General Committee of Public Instructions, which had the responsibility to grant one lakh rupees for education. The committee consisted of 10 members with Lord Macaulay as the President. Interestingly, during that time, there was a rapid change in attitude towards the composition of English education, mainly due to the missionaries and the political influence of the English language. Thus, for the council of the East India Company, the decision for granting money faced a greater problem. The controversy went on for 12 years. Even the General Committee of Public Instruction was also not able to decide the medium of instruction by vote, because out of 10 members, five were supporters of English language or Anglicist as the medium of instruction, and the rest were supporters of the Classical language or Orientalists as a medium of instruction. This is the famous Anglicist and Orientalist controversy.
As the President of the General Committee of Public Instruction, Lord Macaulay wrote a minute (detailed) where he made the conclusion regarding the controversy. By introducing the English language for the education of masses, Macaulay’s opinion was that the public mind of India might expand under the English systems, and through the English language, it may educate the people into a capacity for better government.
