1. The strategy of conservation of wildlife by relocating them from one protected area to another is not often successful.
2. India does not have suitable legislation to save the tigers, and its conservation efforts have failed which forced the tigers to live outside protected areas.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
A male tiger was removed from Panch Tiger Reserve and was relocated in Panna National Park. Later, this tiger trekked toward his home 250 miles away. The trek of this solitary tiger highlights a crisis. Many wildlife reserves exist as islands of fragile habitat in a vast sea of humanity, yet tigers can range over a hundred miles, seeking prey, mates and territory.
Nearly a third of India's tigers live outside tiger reserves, a situation that is dangerous for both human and animal. Prey and tigers can only disperse if there are recognized corridors of land between protected areas to allow unmolested passage.
Correct Answer: (a) 1 only
Solution:It is mentioned in the passage how a male tiger that was relocated in Panna National Park trekked toward its home 250 miles away; and that nearly a third of India's tigers live outside tiger reserves. These points indicate that though initiatives have been taken for the conservation of wildlife by relocating them, they have not been often successful. The passage does not say anything about any legislation in this regard.