Solution:Statement I and II both are correct.
The statement 1ˢᵗ highlights the compulsory character of public finance and the voluntary character of private finance the state is compulsorily required to incur expenditure on maintenance of law and order, expenditure on the defense sector for protection against foreign aggression and invasion, provision of healthcare services, education, water supply, roads and railways, and other infrastructural facilities.
On the other hand, the private sector need not incur any type of expenditure that is of compulsory character.
Statement II: Public expenditure is incurred not with a view to earning, profits as is the case with expenditure incurred by a private economic unit.
The present system of goverance is that of a welfare state and thus the state is the guardinan of the economic and social health of an economy.
The public sector cannot afford to keep an eye on the profits earned from provision of public services. Certain items of public expenditure cannot be related to the cost of providing services like social security, healthcare, and education and the public authorities have to use the revenue generated through tax and nontax receipts, only for the maximization of social welfare.
On the other hand, profit generation is the only motive behind carrying out economic activities in the case of the private sector. The private sector (both firms and individuals) will invest the income only in those avenues which have a high potential for profits.