B. There was in the city of Rome a noble senator, named Fulvius, who sent his son, called Titus, being a child, to the city of Athens, in Greece (which was the fountain of all manner of doctrine), there to learn good letters: and caused him to be hosted with a worshipful mart of that city, called Chremes.
C. This Chremes happened to have also a son named Gisippus, who not only was equal to the said young Titus in years, but also in stature, proportion of body, favour, and color of visage, countenance and speech
D. These two young gentlemen, as they seemed to be one in form and personage, so shortly after acquaintance, the same nature wrought in their hearts such a mutual affection, and their wills and appetites daily more and more so confederated themselves, that it seemed none other, when their names were declared, but that they had only changed their places, issuing (as I might say) out of the one body, and entering into the other.
Correct Answer: (c) BCAD
Solution:Sentence B will be the starting line as it contains the main idea of the parajumble i.e. Fulvius, a noble senator of Rome, sent his son, Titus, to Athens, in Greece, to be hosted with Chremes. However, Sentence C states that this Chremes also have a son, Gisippus, who not only was equal to Titus in years, but also in stature & physical appearances. So, C will follow B. Further, Sentence A states that the two children were so like, that without much difficulty it could not be discerned of their proper parents, which was Titus from Gisippus, or Gisippus from Titus & Sentence D states that shortly after acquaintance, the same nature, mutual affection, their wills and appetites confederated themselves so much, that when their names were declared, they had only changed their places, issuing out of the one body, and entering into the other. So, D will follow A. Going through the options, option c has the correct sequence.