Differences between Unwritten Constitution and the Written Constitution
Unwritten Constitution | Written Constitution |
Unwritten constitution refers to the constitution not codified in a structured manner. | Written Constitution refers to the constitution codified and compiled in a structured and cohesive manner. |
Unwritten Constitution evolves over a long period with a new set of laws and guidelines being added as time progresses. | Written constitutions have been properly framed and compiled in a step-by-step matter, with any subsequent changes being added almost instantaneously. |
Rigid, flexible or both. | Majorly flexible, however, there can be instances where even the Written Constitution is rigid. |
The Parliament is supreme in a country where there is an unwritten constitution. | The constitution is supreme. |
The judiciary has limited powers. | The judiciary has more power in order to ensure constitutional supremacy. |
The Magna Carta can be considered the earliest form of the unwritten constitution. It was a charter of rights signed by King John of England on 15th June 1215. The charter promised to protect the rights of the nobility from the interference of the crown. The Magna Carter would eventually evolve into the unwritten constitution of the United Kingdom. | The Constitution of the United States of America is considered as the oldest written constitution, that is still in force. It was drafted on September 17th, 1787, ratified on June 21st, 1788 and came into effect on March 4th, 1789. James Madison, one of the founding fathers of the United States, wrote the document that formed the model for the Constitution. |