Solution:The basic structure doctrine was given in the landmark decision of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973).
The basic structure doctrine states that the Constitution of India has certain basic features that cannot be altered or destroyed through amendments by the Parliament.
The Supreme Court can undertake judicial review for such amendments. Hence, statement 1 and 2 are correct.
The Supreme Court declared that Article 368 did not enable Parliament to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution and Parliament could not use its amending powers under Article 368 alter the basic structure of the Constitution.
Thus, statement 3 is correct. The Golaknath Case of 1967 relates to the power of the Parliament to curtail the Fundamental Rights provided in the Constitution.
Hence, the basic structure doctrine does not relate to Golaknath case. Hence, statement 4 is incorrect.