Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a "strong" argument and which is a "weak" argument.
Give answer (1) if only argument I is strong.
Give answer (2) if only argument II is strong.
Give answer (3) if either argument I or II is strong.
Give answer (4) if neither argument I nor II is strong.
Give answer (5) if both arguments I and II are strong.
Should graduation be made minimum educational qualification for entry level jobs in any public sector organization?
Arguments : I: Yes, graduates always perform better than the nongraduates by virtue of their higher level of education.
II: No, there are quite a few people who cannot afford to remain unemployed till the completion of graduation and are capable of performing equally well as the graduate candidates.
Correct Answer: (2)
Solution:In a country where welfare is accorded high priority, stricter rules cannot be applied. Further, there is no need to make graduation the minimum educational qualification for entry level jobs in any public sector organisation. Hence, Argument I is not strong. Argument II is logically convincing.