The social networking site Facebook is extremly popular among college students. As of 2012, about 900 million people were members of the site and it regularly shows up among the top 10 most visited destinations on the internet.
Facebook has also become a gold mine of information for researchers. Social scientists at several universities are using Facebook data to examine such topics as self esteem, popularity and personal attraction.
Not surprisingly, Facebook has generated a few new ethical issues as well. To illustrate, researchers at Harvard University studied social relationships by secretly monitoring the Facebook profiles of an entire class of students at a U.S. College.
The 1700 students involved in the project did not know they were being studied, nor had they their permission to the Harvard research team. The researchers promised that they will take steps insure the privacy of all the participants.
Does such a study violate accepted ethical standards. Federal human subjects guidelines were mainly written for an era before Facebook existed and are open to interpretation. As a result many universities have established their own, sometimes conflicting policies.
For example, the institutional review board at Indiana University will not approve research using data from social networking sites without the site's approval or the consent of those being studied.
Other universities seem to rely on the traditional principle that no consent is needed if a researcher is observing public behaviour. But is the information on Facebook public or private?
One side of this argument maintains that Facebook members have no expectations of privacy when it comes to posting information on their pages. Indeed, it appears that the prime motivation of Facebook members is to share the information.
If users choose not to use the privacy safegaurds provided by the site, what they post is fair game. On the other hand, is the assumption of no privacy expectations accurate?
A survey of Facebook members found that most expected, that their profiles would be viewed mainly by a small circle of friends- not the world in general. Sharing information in this limited context is not the same as posting something for all to see.
Further, even if Facebook members intended that the information be made public, it does not necessarily means that they consented to the information's being aggregated, coded, analyzed and distributed.
Once the data were published, even if presented only in the aggregate form, it might be possible for someone to identify the subjects involved in the research.
Indeed, once data from the Harvard University study were released, other researchers quickly identified both the college where the research was conducted and the class that was examined.
Once again, the Internet is forcing researchers to re-examine their traditional assumptions about the ethical dimensions of their research.
Why Facebook as a social networking site is extremly popular among college students?