Over the course of the twentieth century, Britain and India, each in their turn, became arenas of competitive publicity wherein official propaganda vied with that of Indian political parties,
commercial organizations, non-official Europeans, popular pressure groups and their respective media. The two world wars intensified the need for imperial control and news management,
albeit in ways that were specific to large-scale international conflict. It is not intended to examine official war propaganda in this paragraph - a field that has received its fair share of academic attention - except to emphasise the advances made between the conduct of first and the second world wars by the Government of India and Whitehall,
both in their approach to the imperative for such actions, civilian and military, as well as the resources deployed towards this end. London continued to serve as the pre-eminent geographic epicenter for political news, as it had in the nineteenth century,
yet it is necessary to underline the global dimension of the information networks that had matured by the twentieth, encapsulated by, but limited to, institutional developments such as the Empire Press Union (EPU), as well as advances in transport technology (e.g. aviation) and the birth of new media (e.g. radio).
Founded in London during 1909, the EPU brought together under the aegis of the British press, journalists and news agencies of her dependent empire, including India, the Dominions, Crown colonies and protectorates.
The initiative was designed to harness the influence of communication and media technologies to the cause of imperial unity and to encourage intraimperial cooperation and cultural interchange in the sphere of journalism, with the overall aim being to create a transnational information community.
The prominent role of the British national press (Fleet Street) and Reuters international news agency as conveyors of information and conduits of influence continued apace, as did the reach of Reuters subsidiary catering to domestic news, the Associated Press of India (API), established in 1908.
Yet there were challenges to this supremacy: the substantive threat to Reuters' foreign monopoly, was led by the Associated Press of America (AP) and the United Press of America (UP).
Indians, too, had long resented Reuters' symbiotic relationship with the Raj, accusing the agency of subversion and subterfuge.
What did the two world wars contribute to competitive publicity?