While Himmelmann (1998:163) recognizes that there is necessarily overlap in the area of the transcription of data in documentation and description, he argues that collection (i.e., documentary fieldwork) and analysis (i.e., descriptive fieldwork) are different activities in terms of result, procedure and methodology. From a practical point of view, if collection and analysis are not distinguished, researchers will not pay sufficient attention to the activity of collecting.
Secondly, when the documentary data are made available, they should be useful not only to people writing a descriptive grammar, but also to scholars in other disciplines such as anthropology, oral history, sociolinguistics, and discourse analysis. A grammatical description, on the other hand, is primarily useful only to grammarians and comparativists. Finally, description is different from documentation because there is no automatic procedure for deriving description from data, since depending on the underlying theoretical framework, different descriptions can and will result.
Documentary fieldwork involves:
Correct Answer: C. Collection of data
Solution:Documentary fieldwork essentially involves the collection of data. This typically includes gathering of linguistic and cultural information from various sources. The process includes recording, transcribing, and translating interviews, narratives, and other forms of discourse. This raw data forms the basis for analysis and interpretation. The collection of this data is crucial because it provides a real-world context for understanding the language and culture being studied. It can also serve as a resource for future studies and can be useful to scholars in various disciplines.